The GLP-1 Question

Everyone wants the drug.
Someone pays the plan.

Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound — the most requested drugs in America, at four figures a month, forever. Whatever posture your plan takes, take it with the math in front of you. Sixty seconds.

Size it for your plan

Covered plans commonly see 2–8% in year one; requests run higher. Include a guess for spouses if they're on your plan.
List runs ~$1,000–1,350/mo; after rebates many plans net ~$550–750. Your PBM contract decides which number is yours.
Estimated annual plan impact
$0

The three postures — honestly

1 · Cover it openly

Richest · costliest
The case for

Strongest recruiting and retention signal in benefits right now. Real clinical upside for the right patients. No fights, no gray areas.

The trade-off

You just added the number above to your base — permanently, compounding at every renewal. Utilization rarely goes down; refill persistence and dependents push it up.

2 · Cover with guardrails

Where most plans land
The case for

Prior auth with BMI/comorbidity criteria, required lifestyle-program enrollment, step therapy, and quantity limits typically cut spend 30–50% versus open coverage while keeping the benefit real.

The trade-off

Guardrails are only as good as the PBM enforcing them — and some PBMs profit when utilization rises. Expect appeals, employee friction, and the need to actually audit the criteria.

3 · Exclude weight-loss use

Cheapest · leakiest
The case for

Diabetes indications stay covered (they almost always must); weight-loss use doesn't hit the plan. On paper, the impact above goes near zero.

The trade-off

Off-label workarounds and diagnosis drift leak spend back in quietly. Employees notice the exclusion — it reads as the plan saying no to the one drug they asked about. And you'll revisit this decision every single renewal.

Estimates are illustrative — actual impact depends on your PBM contract (rebate pass-through changes the per-user number by hundreds a month), your demographics, and your guardrail design. None of this is medical or legal advice; coverage rules for diabetes indications and state mandates vary.